The plaintiffs were being entitled to a decree for the extent of their share, excluding the share on the small, along with the fit was decreed appropriately. The revision petition was partly recognized. The petitioner’s grounds for condoning the hold off in submitting the list of witnesses were not thought https://rafaelthvsw.ageeksblog.com/30109637/the-best-side-of-covenants-and-land-use-restrictions-advocate-in-karachi-near-me